Confess for an accused....!

http://steadyaku-steadyaku-husseinhamid.blogspot.sg/2015/01/an-anwar-ibrahim-in-sungai-buloh-is.html

B.I Sivamala

1 second ago  -  Shared publicly

"Which nation, what legal system and why would a Prime Minister and an Attorney General amongst others, concern themselves with what has been done to the a... of Saiful?"

Anwar I thought denied the act.  You mean: ... what has been alleged to have been done to ......" or "allegedly done to ...."
Otherwise it may tantamount to confessing for him. 

Post Script:

Anwar did not admit anything until he was convicted  and conviction upheld by the Federal Court.

It is not a defence to say that so many others too are committing parking offence or beating the red traffic light.  They were all not caught. If you have been, then you have to pay the fine. The Court  only adjudicates in respect of persons accused before it.   If you did not commit the offence, it is then a  different matter.

If you say others have also dommitted the offence, then it means you committed the offence too. It is a form of admission..

(யானெழுதிய ஆசிரியப்பா......

அண்மைக் காலமாய் இங்கு வரவே............


(யானெழுதிய ஆசிரியப்பா. கவிதை இன்புறுவோர் கண்டு மகிழ்க )


https://bishyamala.wordpress.com/2015/02/13/356/https://bishyamala.wordpress.com/2015/02/13/356/


எதிரியினி எழுந்திடாமல் இருப்ப தற்கும்
இடுகின்ற வழக்குக்க ரசியல் நோக்கம்

எனத் தொடங்கும் விருத்தமும்  இங்குக் காணலாம்.

https://bishyamala.wordpress.com/2015/02/13/

A critique legal on Malaysian Appeal Court

The Court of Appeal’s “Outline of Reasons” in Anwar Ibrahim v PP – A Critique - See more at: http://www.loyarburok.com/2009/07/22/the-court-of-appeals-outline-of-reasons-in-anwar-ibrahim-v-pp-a-critique/#sthash.15WvMaJW.dpuf

http://www.loyarburok.com/2009/07/22/the-court-of-appeals-outline-of-reasons-in-anwar-ibrahim-v-pp-a-critique/